Articles, blog posts, press releases. This is more of my forte. Some of these pieces have been published in major publications such as Voiceoverxtra.com, The Philly Ad Club Magazine, and Nexxt.com
Written by Sean Ahern
06/05/2020
Huge budget ad agencies are hiding behind their special effects and celebrity endorsements. I’m getting tired of irately shouting at my TV, screaming from my northeast Philadelphia basement at an unheedful world that I could do a far better job if I had the same million dollar budget. Here are some of the more lazy television ad approaches I’ve noticed over and over again:
I’ll start with the most aggravating ad, the “broad analogy” as I like to call it. A good example would be something like “Does this make sense?” as you view some absurd situation that clearly makes no sense, such as someone trying to fill up their gas tank with maple syrup, wearing shoes on their hands, etc. This is followed by something like “Of course it doesn’t, but what does make sense is trusting our brand with your money”. There is no creativity here, folks. You could come up with any inane situation, say it doesn’t make sense, or that it’s wrong and your brand is right, or this is stupid and your brand is smart. Make it look awesome with special effects and use CGI to create these otherworldly visuals of people getting to work riding a tyrannosaurus rex, and viewers are blown away without even knowing that there’s no real creativity in the ad. Imagine what could be created with, let’s say a brilliant mind like mine, in conjunction with the budget the big boys have. True creative gold, that’s what. But I’ll just keep shouting at the TV for now until someone figures that out (can you tell I’m slightly flustered)?
“You’re watching an ad right now.”
This one drives me nuts.
This was a pretty cool approach at first, I’ll give you that, but now everyone’s doing it. “We can’t show you the rest of this ad because we ran out of money in our budget.” *Scoffs* Yeah, right. This makes people say, “wow, look how transparent they’re being, it makes me feel like they have nothing to hide. Also, its so meta, how creative!” Well guess what: it’s NOT that creative (perhaps my previous use of the word ‘flustered’ was a bit restrained). In fact, these ads are so transparent, that I see right through the psychology of the entire approach. Again, no real creativity here, folks.
I call this one the “red deodorant” ad so as to not name any names, but maybe you know the guys I’m talking about. If you’re unsure, you’ll probably realize as I go into more detail. I’m talking about the ads of a gladiator riding a dolphin with a jetpack, a man with 6 arms playing a drum set while levitating, etc. What are they selling though? Deodorant. Simple, basic deodorant. I get the approach; take something lackluster and basic and use ridiculous visuals that appeal to the younger generation and their strange sense of humor in order to market it as something “awesome” or “epic”. Yet again, no creativity here. Anyone can think of some stupid other-worldly situation and then insert a deodorant stick in the character’s hand at some point. There is no play on the actual product, no witty connection of deodorant to a concept or idea. You simply create the absurd situation that’ll make any 22 year old expel their mountain dew out of their nostrils, and then sloppily and arbitrarily add the product wherever you want. Hopefully people realize that using a particular brand of deodorant does not allow you to punch through walls or shoot lasers out of your nose.
This ad is slightly less relevant to the topic, but I feel the need to mention it. The “over edit” is the cutting and moving of a voice over or dialogue to make it seem as if it were unscripted, and that the editor had to take this ‘real’ testimony of a ‘real’ customer and edit it for it to work in the ad. Well you know what, I’m pretty insulted by that. Yeah, I am. It’s an insult to my intelligence. I know for a fact these people are actors. Maybe other people don’t know, but I do, and I’m calling you guys out for it. Don’t get me wrong, some editing is often very necessary, and adds a nice production value to the dialogue. However, it seems that the hip and cool thing to do is practically form entire sentences with spliced and cut words as a sort of audible ransom note. Wow, audible ransom note…that’s pretty good. See that people? It’s me who’s got all the bright ideas (I swear the narcissism is strictly for comedic effect).
Don Draper, the greatest ad-man to ever exist, has decried the use of celebrity endorsements, calling them ‘lazy’. I agree, they’re lazy. ‘Nuff said.
When’s the last time you really, really laughed at an advertisement? If an ad actually makes you laugh (I’m talking about a really big laugh) you’re sure to remember it. You tell your friends about it. You remember the brand. When the time comes to choose between two or three competing brands, you go with the one that actually brightened your day instead of just rudely interrupting your fourth go-around of Game of Thrones. If some actual creative thought went into these huge budget ads, the results could be astronomical. Sadly though, agencies would rather just rely on their big budgets to create something that us little guys can’t. By the way, if you’re a big agency creative exec and I’ve offended you, good. I’ll meet you any time, any place, anywhere for a heated but civilized argument over coffee or tea. Bring it on.
Written by Sean Ahern
Laugh Traffic
Artists get taken advantage of all the time. As a professional audio engineer working for several marketing agencies, I serve not only as the producer but also as the liaison between talent and the agency. That being said, it’s often up to me to solve any sort of payment dispute. It shouldn’t be up to me, but I have a feeling it’s because both parties would rather do a “he/she said to tell you” sort of thing.
One VO artist in particular that I’ve worked with for years has had their fair share of issues with payment and use of their voice. I decided to ask them a few questions in order to shine some light on the situation.
What was the worst incident in which you didn’t get paid for VO services?
I was owed $3,000. The client later had a stroke, so collecting payment at that time seemed uncouth. I waited a few years, and carried the balance forward until he recovered. I reached out some time later, and when we reconnected, he indicated that he really wanted to get me paid and that he “had some things in the works”, and that I should call him back in 5-6 weeks. After several attempts to follow up, I received a call from the client’s sister, telling me that he had committed suicide. I did not get paid.
Do you feel as though you often get taken advantage of as a VO artist?
Yes. In usage and cost.
How?
Firstly, I oftentimes feel that the spots i record are used multiple times beyond the cycles I’ve been told they’d be used for, but because, in many cases, i live out of market, i have no way of knowing. I have, however, accidentally discovered “abused usage” scenarios, and have had to chase down the money. It’s not fun, and sometimes, the client will either deny it, or pay it, or pay it and then never hire me again.
Are you paid enough compared to the industry average?
I don’t believe that I am. But, these days it’s hard to know what the “industry average is”. Many times an individual ad agency or production company will set a rate and if i don’t follow it, they will hire someone else. in these trying times, I cannot afford to push back. There are too many low-cost voice over providers that drive the prices down, and I don’t want to participate with those entities, but the competition is too great to take those chances. It’s a grave landscape out there.
How can other VO artists ensure that they get paid for services rendered?
Go union. And, do everything in your power to help clients understand that this protects everyone’s best interests. And it keeps track of when and where spots are used, so voice artists are appropriately compensated, and clients don’t have to keep track of everything and have to do extra work later. Also, there is a set rate sheet in place that negates the need for haggling, creating a negative environment for an artist to have to justify their costs.. I can’t think of any other way. If a client refuses to “go union”, unless they are able to provide an acceptable reason why not, then perhaps this is not a client who respects the voice artist and what they are bringing to the table, and are just trying to be cheap, with no accountability.
Going union is a great way to get paid industry standard rates that also factor in size and scope of how your voice is being used. However, not all artists want to go union. Union artists run the risk of being undercut by cheaper non-union voices. The agencies that I work for have never and will never hire union VO artists; we always make sure to check before sending any work. The concept of the union functions best in an ideal world where every artist is a part of it, but unfortunately that isn’t reality. So what else can you do as a VO artist to protect yourself?
First, I highly recommend always asking for a P.O. (purchase order) before beginning any work. Often, and especially with fast-paced deadlines in the agency world, artists will be pressured to rush an order out to air on time, without receiving the P.O. The P.O. will serve as adequate proof of the job, especially if there’s a job number associated with it as well.
Additionally, be wary of agencies asking you for “scratch tracks”. There have been many times where an artist, especially a new artist, will send a scratch track as an audition, but since the audio is usually ready for airing anyway, the agency will use it as the finished product. If you submit an audition or scratch track, be sure to follow up.
If you’re servicing a new client who you don’t know or trust yet, ask for half of your pay up front for at least your first couple jobs with them. They may or may not agree, depending on how they stand with the aforementioned issue on the risk of client disapproval. Additionally, have a contract written up by a professional and ask the agency to read and sign it before any work begins. Be sure to outline how you would like to be paid depending on what you provide (multiple voices, singing, acting), how its used (scope and size of audience), and how you’d be compensated for your time (production cost mentioned before). You may also want to consider hiring an agent to represent you who can help with these steps.
In certain situations, I’ll send an approved script to a VO artist, give them the direction that was described to me by creative and the AE, they send it back, I complete the spot, my team approves it, sends the P.O., and then sends the spot to the client. The artist’s rate was approved, the job was done, and they’re expecting to be paid. However, it turns out that the client hates it. They may not even necessarily hate the read, but more so the concept or script. Either way, they won’t accept it.
This in turn results in the agency saying: “Well, the client didn’t use the spot, and didn’t pay us for the work, so we can’t pay your invoice”.
I’ve asked the opinion of a few VO artists regarding this specific situation. Collectively we all agreed that the artist should at the very least get paid a “production cost” for their time spent recording. We also agreed that the agency should understand that there’s always this sort of risk in a client services based industry, and that the agency should roll with the punches and still pay the artist. After all, there are more valuable things than a couple hundred bucks, such as relationships with your vendors as well as your reputation as an agency. Unfortunately, some agencies are just cheap, and may try to pull this sort of thing on you at some point. A good preventative measure would be to ask for a certain percentage of your invoice still be paid to you if the spot doesn’t air. Very rarely will one of our clients disapprove a spot; so this is a relatively safe measure to take that will not only be fair to you and the agency, but will also further develop the business relationship between the two of you.
The agency hasn’t paid you yet. Actually, it’s been a couple months now. What can you do? You could pursue legal action, but it may end up costing you more money, and the agency will most likely never work with you again. Plus, if you don’t have a contract or P.O., things might be even more difficult.
Similar to how the agency should acknowledge the risk of client dissatisfaction, you will also have to assume the risk of an agency not being able to pay you. I say “not being able” because it’s more likely that the agency is in some sort of financial pickle as opposed to them being cheap and evil people who want to steal your VO. In actuality, agencies go bankrupt often enough. Try to be patient while still following up regularly. Usually if you send enough emails, they’ll get around to paying you.
(an excerpt)
PHILADELPHIA, PA, Nov. 28th, 2018
Cats playing piano. 7 second video loops. Shrek. Young daredevils doing backflips on top of skyscrapers. Peyote enthusiasts at music festivals. Fortnite. Recipes involving copious amounts of bacon. Homemade slime. Mumble rap.
Create content using at least one of these millennial favored topics and you might have a shot at winning a millennial’s attention. Do it successfully, and you may have just created the next hottest “meme.”
Millennials and Generation Z individuals love “memes.” You’ve heard of memes but don’t quite understand them. Does a meme have a standardized format? A common recurring factor? Can you define the word “meme” in a way that encapsulates all memes
accurately?
The answer is no. If you ask a truly honed meme enthusiast, they’ll tell you that anything can be a meme. The definition has blurred so significantly that if someone spills coffee on their shirt, someone may say:
“Now that is one spicy meme”
A meme can be “spicy?”
Take a look at an Old Spice commercial. Or Dollar Shave Club. Or Dr. Pepper. You may notice dolphins with jet packs, or a 400 pound body builder lifting a car in one hand and playing drums with their 4 additional CGI arms. You may ask yourself, “what in the world did I just witness?”
By Sean Ahern
What skills will be the most desirable by employers in the upcoming future? Hard skills that are based on technology, or soft skills such as time management? Given our rapidly expanding technological world, you would assume the former, but you may be surprised to hear what skills many applicants are lacking that are becoming more in demand as time goes on.
Many applicants work and study diligently to learn hard skills such as data analysis and computer programming in order to become qualified enough for highly rigorous positions, but often fail to acknowledge and hone other highly valuable soft skills. Employers now and will be seeking a balance of hard and soft skills in applicants as it demonstrates a well rounded education and skill-set. For instance, if an applicant has a hard skill of application development and is also highly creative, then they have the potential of not only creating the technical back end of the application but also designing an eye catching and innovative user interface and front end experience. Some other soft skills that are in high demand are:
Employers prefer applicants that can make well informed decisions on their own, requiring less management. As we move into an era that is utilizing more and more data to influence decisions, being able to analyze data and subsequently use proper judgment in what business action to implement is highly valuable. In this case, the soft skill of decision making actually bolsters the hard skill of data analysis.
More and more companies are downsizing their staff as they hire employees who are proficient in more areas than one. Having smaller teams also allows better communication between team members. Being able to multitask between different areas of expertise, such as writing copy for a website and also being able to design the backend of the website, is an extremely valuable trait.
Every now and then an employee has that “janitor to vice president” moment in their career where they offer a new and innovative plan of action for the company to take. An employee who doesn’t just simply do their job but who is actively seeking more efficient and innovative solutions that can be undertaken by the entire company is someone who has upper management written all over them. During your interview, tell the employer how you sprinted past the secretary as they shouted “they’re in a meeting!” and revealed to the CEO a new strategy that saved the company an enormous amount of money.
Finally, you’re significantly more likely to be hired if you’re a likable person who is able to communicate and work well with others. It may seem a bit biased, as maybe you have a certain type of “resting face” that you worry will put you out of the running, but you have to remember that everyone is human, and that you’ll be working with these people every day in the same room.
By Sean Ahern
We’ve all experienced being “ghosted” after an interview. If you’ve recently applied for a job and haven’t heard back in over a month, you’re likely being ghosted right now. However, put down the giant tub of ice cream and try to remember that “it’s just business.” Let’s look at why an applicant would be ghosted, what to do afterwards, and how to prevent being ghosted in the future.
Nine times out of ten, an employer will neglect to contact you after an interview either because you yourself haven’t followed up, or the employer is too busy/hiring for multiple positions that need to be filled quickly.
If the employer is struggling to fill a variety of positions with little time to spare, they will most likely have dozens of interviews for several positions and will not be able to respond to applicants who didn’t make the cut for the sake of time. While there is an option of using an automated system or mail-merge to quickly inform all of the non-chosen applicants, most employers or hiring managers do not implement such a system and would have to write each email individually, or at least copy and paste the same message for each applicant, but even doing this could take up a significant amount of time.
Choosing to not follow up after an interview can also be detrimental. While it seems like more of a supplementary step, following up will at least most likely warrant a response even if you didn’t get the job. After all, most candidates want to know if they didn’t get hired so that they can focus their efforts on other jobs, especially if they’re handling multiple opportunities and need to know which to still consider as options before accepting another position.
In order to prevent being ghosted, it’s wise to follow up a couple weeks after the interview. This will remind the employer about your interview, and also send a signal indicating that you need to know whether or not you were hired in order to accept or reject a different job offer. Another option, of course, is to nail the interview and get hired, since your odds of being ghosted are pretty slim if you’re the chosen candidate. You may also want to consider that they are still interviewing, as some companies conduct interviews for several months.
Your last option would be to find a connection of LinkedIn who works for the employer you’re hiring for. You can ask this person for insider information as to whether or not interviews are still being conducted. You may even ask them to put in a good word for you if you know them well enough.
You’re more likely to be ghosted than to receive a follow up informing you that you didn’t get the job, so be prepared. If you do have another job offer waiting, try to get a response back as to what’s going on in the hiring process so that you don’t turn down a different job for no reason. The best advice is to simply nail every interview, roll with the punches, and not get discouraged if you don’t hear back. It’s not you, it’s them.